All Posts by Transport Action Ontario

About the Author

Three GO trains passing on the busy Oakville Subdivision
Apr 11

Metrolinx overspeed incident demonstrates urgent need for Enhanced Train Control, requires independent investigation 

By Transport Action Ontario | Intercity Rail and Bus

Revelations in the Toronto Star on March 13, 2026 alerted the public of a potentially catastrophic near-miss incident on January 5, 2026 involving a GO train traversing a 15 mph crossover at almost 70 mph, narrowly avoiding a derailment. This incident had not been publicly and independently investigated. In response, Transport Action Ontario wrote to Metrolinx CEO Michael Lindsay and Ontario Minister of Transportation Prabmeet Sakaria on March 16, with a clear request: 

We require Metrolinx to immediately transfer responsibility for this investigation and all other near-miss incident investigations to the Transportation Safety Board of Canada.

Our letter to Mr. Lindsay is attached. Despite sending a follow-up email two weeks later, we have not received a response to this letter, which deepens our concern.

An internal investigation is not appropriate or acceptable for a near-miss that easily could have become a very serious accident with multiple fatalities, and with similarities to the VIA Rail Burlington crash of 2012. The article also revealed that this was the fourth time in the past year that a GO train had passed a stop signal. The investigation of these incidents and all similar incidents on any railway in Canada, whether provincially or federally regulated, must be fully independent and handled by the Transportation Safety Board of Canada.

Transport Action Ontario recognizes and welcomes the progress Metrolinx has made in improving its own and Canada’s safety practices and requiring its suppliers to appoint an Independent Safety Assessor in accordance with global best practices. The same rigorous safety culture must also apply to the operating railway, with fully independent and transparent safety oversight and investigation that also generates detailed public reports and findings that both current and future railway professionals can learn from.  This is in line with global best practices, to continuously improve safety for railway employees, passengers, and the general public.

Similar incidents in the United Kingdom (Overspeed at Spital Junction, Peterborough) and Australia (Exceedance of temporary speed restriction by XPT ST21, Lack of effective risk controls prior to Blacktown rail overspeed event), for example, are independently investigated, as are Metrolinx incidents on CN trackage (R24T0064 – Movement exceeds limits of authority). 

Independent investigations also help to ensure that the railway’s safety culture is just and fair, like airline safety culture, so train crews are not disciplined for raising concerns nor for happening to be on duty when the system fails around them. We also therefore regard the swift dismissal of the Alstom crew from the January incident, prior to the completion of an independent investigation, as a possible additional source of concern.

Urgent need for Enhanced Train Control

Since 1995, the Transportation Safety Board has recommended engineering controls to prevent signals being passed in error. Such technology is used worldwide and has existed in various forms since as early as 1872. Transport Canada published a Notice of Intent in 2022 describing how it intended to implement Enhanced Train Control in Canada by 2030, a target date which now appears likely to be missed.  

Metrolinx has chosen European Train Control System (ETCS) technology to provide this crucial safety system, and is working toward a pilot deployment and testing. Once ETCS Level 2 is implemented across the GO network, it will automatically update each train’s onboard computer and cab display with movement authorities and upcoming track speed information.  It will also enforce braking if the locomotive engineer does not respond appropriately, reducing the risk of an overspeed incident or passing a stop signal to very low levels.

Based on recent information on GO Expansion timelines, it appears that ETCS will not be installed until electrification is installed, up to 10 years from now.  The additional near-misses on the GO network, not previously publicly disclosed by Metrolinx, on top of frequent near-misses and incidents on federally regulated trackage across Canada that have been investigated by the TSB, indicates that further delay in ETCS implementation involves more risk than policymakers may previously have been aware of.

While the risk of a passenger on any given GO train trip being involved in an incident that results in injury is still low, and far lower than the risk of driving in Ontario, the risk for regular commuters is cumulative over time and could reach unacceptable levels if engineering controls to reduce it are not implemented in reasonable time.

We therefore asked Mr. Lindsay to share with us Metrolinx’s risk assessment for the currently expected timeline for the rollout of ETCS, together with any additional technical and operational measures that the agency is or will now be taking to control this risk to the lowest reasonably practicable level in the intervening years.

According to the Toronto Star’s report, the internal Metrolinx report also expressed concern about reputational damage. Safety must come first, otherwise reputation is forfeit anyway. Railway safety is achieved through transparent and independent public investigation of accidents and near misses, and then promptly acting upon the findings of those investigations, which in Canada includes the implementation of Enhanced Train Control.

We call upon the province of Ontario to ensure that Metrolinx has all the technical and financial resources necessary to complete the deployment of ETCS as soon as reasonably practicable and with a clearly defined project timeline.

Apr 07

Ford’s Expansion Plans for Billy Bishop Airport face “Uncomfortable Truths”

By Transport Action Ontario | Aviation , Latest News

After about a decade of relative quiet, Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport (BBTCA) has re-emerged as a major public issue.  Back in 2014, Transport Action Ontario (TAO) and other non-government organizations were very active in opposing expansion plans which would allow jets to land at BBTCA.  Our objections were two fold: (a) short haul air travel should be replaced by intercity passenger rail, which is more environmentally sustainable and (b) higher safety requirements for jet aircraft will negatively impact the Toronto waterfront.

In 2024, due to impending new regulations from Transport Canada, Ports Toronto, the airport operator, applied for and received a 12-year extension to the multi-government tripartite agreement, allowing it to operate the airport until 2045.   Once this life extension was granted, Ports Toronto set to work on the creation of Runway End Safety Areas (RESAs), required to be completed by July 2027.  The RESAs are open space areas at each end of Runway 08/26 allowing for safer operation.  All other operating restrictions at BBCA, including the no jets restriction, remained in place.

In March 2026, Premier Ford suddenly called for a runway extension to accommodate jets, due to alleged economic benefits. He followed this up with a vow to expropriate the City of Toronto’s 20% ownership of the airport and indicated that BBTCA would be designated a Special Economic Zone under Ontario Bill 5 to reduce provincial and municipal hurdles.  

But Premier Ford’s eagerness ignores many “uncomfortable truths”:

  • Any expansion of BBTCA falls under federal jurisdiction, not provincial.  To date, the feds have given mixed signals.
  • With BBTCA operating under grandfathered federal safety regulations, any expansion would likely bring new federal regulations passed in 2015 into play.  These new regulations are more onerous.
  • Expanding Billy Bishop will require wider runways, altered taxiways, relocated aircraft parking and a larger terminal, all of which would be very difficult and costly to squeeze into the very small footprint of BBTCA.  It is, after all, an island airport.
  • The on-shore arrival and departure areas will need to expand to be able to process more passengers and marine search and rescue services will need to expand so as to be able to handle incidents involving larger aircraft.
  • Due to larger exclusion zones, marine activity in Toronto harbour will likely be severely affected, affecting the Island ferries and tourist vessels.
  • Introducing jets, with their lower obstacle limitation surfaces, will likely limit the development of tall apartment towers in the Portlands, reducing Toronto’s future housing supply in an era of housing shortage.
  • Passenger volumes through BBTCA have declined in the past decade and continue to decline.  This is likely due to the growing attractiveness and better connections to the UPX train to Pearson International Airport (PIA).   Furthermore, PIA has recently announced expansion plans providing sufficient capacity for decades.
  • The cost of expanding Billy Bishop can likely not be funded from Airport Improvement Fees, thereby requiring taxpayer funding.
  • The overall business case, considering costs of expansion and declining ridership, is likely very poor.

As in 2014, TAO will be supporting local non-government organizations, lead by Waterfront for All (WfA),  in opposing this expansion.   WfA has asked that the first step be the development of a definitive proposal, showing land masses, lighting structures, exclusion zones, on shore facilities, permitted tower heights, full costs etc.  Then, and only then, can our political leaders and the public fully assess the complex effects and any tradeoffs.    We recall that In 2014, the process was backward – the political discussion preceded definitive facts – and a lot of time and resources were wasted. TAO supports the WfA approach.

Apr 06

Letter to Minister MacKinnon regarding concerns on 3 Ontario infrastructure projects

By Transport Action Ontario | Aviation , Highways and Bridges , Latest News , Northern Ontario

Transport Action Ontario has written to federal Minister of Transport MacKinnon regarding three provincial infrastructure projects that are concerning, in our view. The letter gives detailed rationales for our opinion. We recommended that any federal financial participation should be denied.

The three projects are:

  • Proposed Highway 401 tunnel under the City of Toronto (ineffective and costly)
  • Expansion and jet traffic at Billy Bishop airport, downtown Toronto (large impact, better alternatives)
  • Ring of Fire transportation infrastructure (should do road + rail)

Our letter can be viewed below.

Apr 02

GO Expansion – Details Emerge, Timing Slipping

By Transport Action Ontario | Latest News , Urban Transit

Transport Action Ontario has long been a strong supporter of the GO Expansion project, which proposes an ambitious plan to introduce 15 minute or better all-day two-way electrified passenger rail service on core portions of 5 GO lines, plus improved service on the remainder of the network.  However, as described in our posting of June 28, 2025, problems began to emerge last year with the termination of a contract with ONxpress Operations over “differences of opinion” and hints of “descoping”.  Few details were available.

In December, 2025, Metrolinx released a helpful high-level roadmap of the numerous steps needed to achieve its expansion goals, with a chart called Corridor “Missions” Guiding Incremental Growth.  For example, it identified 16 steps needed to achieve the mission on the Stouffville line, ranging from smaller items like station improvements and extra track to large system-wide missions like electrification, ETCS signaling and fleet procurement.  However, the chart showed no timing.

Further details have emerged in March, based on an internal staff report on fleet strategy obtained by the media. Based on these reports, electrification of the Lakeshore East and West lines is not planned until 2036, with other lines following.  Due to the numerous level crossings in the network, service will not involve short trains at very high frequencies (3 to 8 minute headways), but remains as longer trains with 15 minute headways. 

While the prolonged schedule is a disappointment, the Province does seem committed to the project and construction continues on many pieces.  In fact, Ontario is doing advance planning on a further expansion called GO 2.0 and is requesting federal support funding.

Mar 17

Comments from ALTO Consultation Sessions

By Transport Action Ontario | Intercity Rail and Bus , Latest News

Transport Action Ontario and Transport Action Canada members have been actively participating in ALTO’s stakeholder roundtables and public consultation sessions, being held in central/eastern Ontario and western Quebec during January – March, 2026. We have also been monitoring social and conventional media coverage and reviewing issues internally. We have submitted a letter to ALTO summarizing our observations and comments. The letter contains 18 points, organized into 7 categories:

  • ANALYSIS, including business case, ridership and transparency
  • SERVICE, including station locations, conventional service and fares
  • CONSTRUCTION, including wildlife movement, bridges/viaducts, drainage, First Nations
  • CORRIDOR AVOIDANCE
  • COMPENSATION
  • FUTURE COMMUNICATIONS
  • SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO

Our letter can be viewed below.

1 2 3 80