Category Archives for "Intercity Rail and Bus"

Three GO trains passing on the busy Oakville Subdivision
Apr 11

Metrolinx overspeed incident demonstrates urgent need for Enhanced Train Control, requires independent investigation 

By Transport Action Ontario | Intercity Rail and Bus

Revelations in the Toronto Star on March 13, 2026 alerted the public of a potentially catastrophic near-miss incident on January 5, 2026 involving a GO train traversing a 15 mph crossover at almost 70 mph, narrowly avoiding a derailment. This incident had not been publicly and independently investigated. In response, Transport Action Ontario wrote to Metrolinx CEO Michael Lindsay and Ontario Minister of Transportation Prabmeet Sakaria on March 16, with a clear request: 

We require Metrolinx to immediately transfer responsibility for this investigation and all other near-miss incident investigations to the Transportation Safety Board of Canada.

Our letter to Mr. Lindsay is attached. Despite sending a follow-up email two weeks later, we have not received a response to this letter, which deepens our concern.

An internal investigation is not appropriate or acceptable for a near-miss that easily could have become a very serious accident with multiple fatalities, and with similarities to the VIA Rail Burlington crash of 2012. The article also revealed that this was the fourth time in the past year that a GO train had passed a stop signal. The investigation of these incidents and all similar incidents on any railway in Canada, whether provincially or federally regulated, must be fully independent and handled by the Transportation Safety Board of Canada.

Transport Action Ontario recognizes and welcomes the progress Metrolinx has made in improving its own and Canada’s safety practices and requiring its suppliers to appoint an Independent Safety Assessor in accordance with global best practices. The same rigorous safety culture must also apply to the operating railway, with fully independent and transparent safety oversight and investigation that also generates detailed public reports and findings that both current and future railway professionals can learn from.  This is in line with global best practices, to continuously improve safety for railway employees, passengers, and the general public.

Similar incidents in the United Kingdom (Overspeed at Spital Junction, Peterborough) and Australia (Exceedance of temporary speed restriction by XPT ST21, Lack of effective risk controls prior to Blacktown rail overspeed event), for example, are independently investigated, as are Metrolinx incidents on CN trackage (R24T0064 – Movement exceeds limits of authority). 

Independent investigations also help to ensure that the railway’s safety culture is just and fair, like airline safety culture, so train crews are not disciplined for raising concerns nor for happening to be on duty when the system fails around them. We also therefore regard the swift dismissal of the Alstom crew from the January incident, prior to the completion of an independent investigation, as a possible additional source of concern.

Urgent need for Enhanced Train Control

Since 1995, the Transportation Safety Board has recommended engineering controls to prevent signals being passed in error. Such technology is used worldwide and has existed in various forms since as early as 1872. Transport Canada published a Notice of Intent in 2022 describing how it intended to implement Enhanced Train Control in Canada by 2030, a target date which now appears likely to be missed.  

Metrolinx has chosen European Train Control System (ETCS) technology to provide this crucial safety system, and is working toward a pilot deployment and testing. Once ETCS Level 2 is implemented across the GO network, it will automatically update each train’s onboard computer and cab display with movement authorities and upcoming track speed information.  It will also enforce braking if the locomotive engineer does not respond appropriately, reducing the risk of an overspeed incident or passing a stop signal to very low levels.

Based on recent information on GO Expansion timelines, it appears that ETCS will not be installed until electrification is installed, up to 10 years from now.  The additional near-misses on the GO network, not previously publicly disclosed by Metrolinx, on top of frequent near-misses and incidents on federally regulated trackage across Canada that have been investigated by the TSB, indicates that further delay in ETCS implementation involves more risk than policymakers may previously have been aware of.

While the risk of a passenger on any given GO train trip being involved in an incident that results in injury is still low, and far lower than the risk of driving in Ontario, the risk for regular commuters is cumulative over time and could reach unacceptable levels if engineering controls to reduce it are not implemented in reasonable time.

We therefore asked Mr. Lindsay to share with us Metrolinx’s risk assessment for the currently expected timeline for the rollout of ETCS, together with any additional technical and operational measures that the agency is or will now be taking to control this risk to the lowest reasonably practicable level in the intervening years.

According to the Toronto Star’s report, the internal Metrolinx report also expressed concern about reputational damage. Safety must come first, otherwise reputation is forfeit anyway. Railway safety is achieved through transparent and independent public investigation of accidents and near misses, and then promptly acting upon the findings of those investigations, which in Canada includes the implementation of Enhanced Train Control.

We call upon the province of Ontario to ensure that Metrolinx has all the technical and financial resources necessary to complete the deployment of ETCS as soon as reasonably practicable and with a clearly defined project timeline.

Mar 17

Comments from ALTO Consultation Sessions

By Transport Action Ontario | Intercity Rail and Bus , Latest News

Transport Action Ontario and Transport Action Canada members have been actively participating in ALTO’s stakeholder roundtables and public consultation sessions, being held in central/eastern Ontario and western Quebec during January – March, 2026. We have also been monitoring social and conventional media coverage and reviewing issues internally. We have submitted a letter to ALTO summarizing our observations and comments. The letter contains 18 points, organized into 7 categories:

  • ANALYSIS, including business case, ridership and transparency
  • SERVICE, including station locations, conventional service and fares
  • CONSTRUCTION, including wildlife movement, bridges/viaducts, drainage, First Nations
  • CORRIDOR AVOIDANCE
  • COMPENSATION
  • FUTURE COMMUNICATIONS
  • SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO

Our letter can be viewed below.

Mar 14

Open Letter on ALTO HSR Route Options in Eastern Ontario

By Transport Action Ontario | Intercity Rail and Bus , Latest News , Uncategorized

There have been intensive discussions and concerns in Eastern Ontario about route selection for the ALTO High-Speed Rail proposal. Transport Action Canada has written an open letter to the media summarizing the various route and speed options that have been considered in the past, and identifying other key considerations like maintaining good conventional service and providing impact mitigation.

Our key message is to urge ALTO and Transport Canada to share their cost-benefit analyses and comparative business cases, as this will materially inform the discussions. The public has every right to scrutinize all this information!

Our letter can be viewed below:

David MacLachlan, Chair of Mask-wa Transportation Association Inc., speaking the Agawa Canyon Railroad Station.
Mar 14

Petitions to Fund the “Bear Train”

By Transport Action Ontario | Intercity Rail and Bus , Latest News , Northern Ontario

The Coalition for Algoma Passenger Trains, along with other stakeholders, have initiated petitions to the federal and Ontario governments to each fund 50% of the cost to restore passenger train service between Sault Ste. Marie and Oba Lake, in the form of the Mask-wa Oo-ta-ban (Cree for “Bear Train”. Here are the details of the petitions and how to sign:




 The Coalition for Algoma Passenger Trains (CAPT) is now launching official federal and Ontario provincial petitions in support of Mask-wa Oo-ta-ban, the Bear Train (the passenger train).  

When the petitions are signed by June 12, 2026 they will be presented by our MP Terry Sheehan to the House of Commons and by MPP Bill Rosenberg to the Ontario Legislature.

The petitions support Mask-wa Transportation Association Inc (MTA Inc)’s applications for federal and provincial funding for Phase 1 of the restoration of the passenger train from Sault Ste. Marie to the south end of Oba Lake.  After the Bear Train successfully runs in Phase I, MTA Inc. will apply for funding for Phase II which will be extended to Hearst

For the federal government there are English and French electronic and paper petitions. These petitions can be signed by citizens of Canada.

People can sign both the paper petition and the e-petition.

Federal Electronic petition links:Petition e-7001 (English) Pétition e-7001 (Français)We have also included a printable sheet with information and a QR code to support access to the e-petition.
Printable E-Petition QR code and information sheet link:Printable E-Petition QR code and information sheetThose signing the e-petitions will be required to verify their email address in order to authenticate the signature. If the email is not validated, the signature will not count towards the petition. Please widely share the links to the e-petition with friends, relatives, and contacts.

Federal Paper Petition links:Printable Petition e-7001 (English)Printable Pétition e-7001 (Français)or

For the Ontario government there are English and French paper petitions only, no electronic petitions. These petitions can be signed by residents of Ontario.

Provincial Paper Petition links:Printable Bear Train Petition (English)Printable Bear Train Petition (Français)You can print blank English and/or French Federal and Provincial paper petitions and ask your friends, relatives and other contacts to sign them.

Please sign a petition to the Federal Government AND a petition to the Ontario Government. 

Signed paper petitions can be dropped off at the following locations:
-In Dubreuilville at the Civic Centre

-In Wawa at the Civic Centre

-In Sault Ste. Marie at: (a) Missanabie Cree First Nation, 601 Queen St. East (northeast corner of Queen and Brock)  (b) Algoma Country (334 Bay St.), Monday to Friday, 9AM to 5PM (c) NORDIK Institute (Elgin Tower, 390 Bay St.) on Wednesdays, 9AM to 5PM

-Paper petitions can also be mailed to Coalition for Algoma Passenger Trains, 1254 Queen St. East 
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2E7



Thank you for your time, efforts, and energy. Your support of this petition, Mask-wa Oo-ta-ban (the Bear Train), and the return of passenger rail to the North is appreciated and helps support passenger rail getting back on track. CAPT will continue to keep you updated on a rolling basis.
Mar 14

Southwestern Ontario Forgotten in Transportation Upgrades

By Transport Action Ontario | Intercity Rail and Bus , Latest News , Southwestern Ontario

Transport Action Ontario (TAO) board member Ken Westcar recently published an op-ed about transportation in southwestern Ontario (SWO) in the London Free Press. Although the article expresses his personal opinions, they do mirror the opinions of Transport Action Ontario:

  • The growing and aging population, the higher costs of car ownership and increasing road congestion all require action to improve pubic transportation in SWO.
  • Despite extensive and well-researched input from a Task Force and from stakeholders like TAO, no transportation plan has emerged for SWO after over 6 years of study.
  • Provincial budget announcements have contained no meaningful investments for public transport for SWO, in contrast to Greater Toronto and northern Ontario.

TAO will continue to urge completion of the SWO Transportation Plan and for investment in public transportation. For example, in 2025 we identified 5 low-cost rail investments in SWO that would improve passenger and freight operations. They continue to be good ideas that should be implemented.

1 2 3 47